A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Jagadeesh, K. S.
- Lactic Acid Bacteria as a Source of Functional Ingredients
Authors
1 Department of Agricultural Microbiology, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad 580 005, IN
Source
South Indian Journal of Biological Sciences, Vol 1, No 2 (2015), Pagination: 70-71Abstract
Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) is belong to Gram positive bacteria commonly found in the fermented food and gastro intestinal tract and commonly used in the food industry as a potential starter probiotics. Recently, the interest toward LAB is increased due to their wide application in food and medical field. Among the lactic acid bacteria, Lactobacillus species attracted many researchers because of its wide applications in the medical fields as anticancer, antiproliferative, antioxidant, anti- obesity anti-inflammatory, and antidiabtics. This report shortlisted the importance of LAB for various application.Keywords
Lactic Acid Bacteria, Lactobacillus species, Food, Medical Application.- Microbial Consortia-Mediated Plant Defense against Phytopathogens and Growth Benefits
Authors
1 Department of Agricultural Microbiology, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad 580 005, IN
Source
South Indian Journal of Biological Sciences, Vol 2, No 4 (2016), Pagination: 395-403Abstract
Microorganisms under natural habitats live in communities and some provide benefits to plants. The concept of development of microbial consortia for bio-control and crop sustainability relies on this fact. Microbes when introduced to soil as consortium interact with a host plant, partially mimic the natural soil conditions. To improve stability of the released microbes in different agricultural fields, use of microbial consortia is advocated. Further, microbes together can also offer multiple mechanisms of mycoparasitism, competition, antibiosis, induced systemic resistance etc., to fight pathogens. Microbes in communities also strengthen the capabilities of the partners in an additive or synergistic manner. Although development of microbial consortia is important for management of plant diseases, it is also equally important to understand how they influence plant metabolism when the consortium is introduced to soil. Various plant physiological parameters that are identified to aid biocontrol by pathogens include activation of phenyl propanoid pathway, activation of antioxidant pathways and various stress enzymes such as phenyl alanine ammonia lyase, peroxidase and polyphenol oxidase etc. The compatible microbial consortia trigger defence responses in an enhanced level in crop plants than the microbes alone, and provides better protection against pathogens. Evaluation of compatibility and synergism of microbial components is essential for the success of microbial consortia. Further rapid evaluation methodologies or kits need to be developed for quicker developments in the field of microbial consortia.Keywords
Microbial Consortia, Systemic Resistance, Defense Molecules, Antibiosis, Compatibility.References
- Akanksha S, Sarma BK, Upadhyay RS, Singh HB. (2012). Compatible rhizosphere microbes mediated alleviation of biotic stress in chickpea through enhanced antioxidant and phenylpropanoid activities. Microbiological Research 168, 33-40.
- Alizadeh H, Behboudi K, Ahmadzadeh M, Nikkhah MJ, Zamioudis C, Pieterse CMJ, Bakker PAHM. (2013). Induced systemic resistance in cucumber and Arabidopsis thaliana by the combination of Trichoderma harzianum Tr6 and Pseudomonas sp. Ps14. Biological Control, 65,14–23.
- Calvo J, Calvente V, De Orellano ME, Benuzzi D, De Tosetti MIS. (2003). Improvement in the biocontrol of postharvest diseases of apples with the use of yeast mixtures. Biocontrol 48, 579-593.
- Conway WS, Janisiewicz WJ, Leverentz B, Saftner RA, Camp MJ. (2007). Control of blue mold of apple by combining controlled atmosphere, an antagonist mixture, and sodium bicarbonate. Postharvest Biology and Technology 45, 326-332.
- Dandurand LM, Knudsen GR. (1993). Influence of Pseudomonas fluorescens on hyphal growth and biocontrol activity of Trichoderma harzianumin in the spermosphere and rhizosphere of pea. Phytopathology 83, 265-270.
- Domenech J, Reddy MS, Kloepper JW, Ramos B, Gutierrez- Manero J. (2006). Combined application of the biological product LS213 with Bacillus, Pseudomonas or Chryseobacterium for growth promotion and biological control of soil-borne diseases in pepper and tomato. Biocontrol 51,245-258.
- Duffy BK, Weller DM. (1995). Use of Gaeumannomyces graminis var. graminis alone and in combination with fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. to suppress take-all of wheat. Plant Disease 79, 907-911.
- Dutta S, Mishra AK, Kumar BSD. (2008). Induction of systemic resistance against fusarial wilt in pigeon pea through interaction of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and rhizobia. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 40,452-61.
- Fukui R, Fukui H, Alvarez AM. (1999). Comparisons of single versus multiple bacterial species on biological control of Anthurium blight. Phytopathology 89,366-373.
- Jain A, Singh S, Sarma BK, Singh BH. (2012). Microbial consortium–mediated reprogramming Of defence network in pea to enhance tolerance against Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Journal of Applied Microbiology 1364-5072.
- Jetiyanon K. (2007). Defensive-related enzyme response in plants treated with a mixture of Bacillus strains (IN937a and IN937b) against different pathogens. Biological Control 42, 178-185.
- Kloepper JW, Schroth MN. (1980). Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and plant growth under gnotobiotic conditions. American Phytopathological Society 71,6.-10.
- Lucas JA, Solano BR, Montes F, Ojeda J, Megias M, Manero FJG. (2009). Use of two PGPR strains in the integrated management of blast disease in rice (Oryza sativa) in Southern Spain. Field Crops Research 114, 404-410.
- Lynch JM. (1990). Introduction: some consequences of microbial rhizosphere competence for plant and soil. In; The Rhizosphere. Lynch, J. M. (ed.). Wiley and Sons, Chichester, pages 1-10.
- Marimuthu S, Ramamoorthy V, Samiyappan R, Subbian P. (2013). Intercropping system with combined application of Azospirillum and Pseudomonas fluorescens reduces ischolar_main rot incidence caused by Rhizoctonia bataticola and increases seed cotton yield. Journal of Phytopathology 161, 405-411.
- Moree WJ, Phelan VV, Wu CH, Bandeira N, Cornett DS, Duggan BM, et al. (2012). Inter kingdom metabolic transformations captured by microbial imaging mass spectrometry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109, 13811–13816.
- Muthukumar A, Bhaskaran R, Sanjeevkumar K. (2010). Efficacy of endophytic Pseudomonas fluorescens (Trevisan) migula against chilli damping-off. Journal of Biopesticides 3,105-109.
- Pierson EA, Weller DM. (1994). Use of mixtures of fluorescent pseudomonads to suppress take-all and improve the growth of wheat. Phytopathology 84,940-947.
- Roberts DP, Lohrke SM, Meyer SLF, Buyer JS, Bowers JH, Baker CJ, Li W, de Souza JT, Lewis JA. Chung S. (2005). Biocontrol agents applied individually and in combination for suppression of soil borne diseases of cucumber. Crop Protection 24, 141-155.
- Rudresh DLMK, Shivaprakash MK, Prasad RD. (2005). Effect of combined application Of Rhizobium, phosphate solubilizing bacterium and Trichoderma spp. on growth, nutrient uptake and yield of chickpea (Ciceraritenium L.). Applied Soil Ecology 28, 139–146.
- Singh A, Sarma BK, Upadhyay RS, Singh HB. (2013). Compatible rhizosphere Microbes mediated alleviation of biotic stress in chickpea through enhanced antioxidant and phenylpropanoid activities. Microbiological Research 168, 33-40.
- Srinivasan K, Mathivanan N. (2009). Biological control of sunflower necrosis virus disease with powder and liquid formulations of plant growth promoting microbial consortia under field conditions. Biological Control 51, 395-402.
- Stockwell VO, Johnson KB, Sugar D, Loper JE. (2011). Mechanistically compatibl mixtures of bacterial antagonists improve biological control of fire blight of pear. Phytopathology 101, 113-123.
- Yobo KS, Laing MD, Hunter CH. (2010). Application of selected biological control agents in conjunction with tolclofos-methyl for the control of damping-off caused by Rhizoctonia solani. African Journal of Biotechnology 9, 1789-1796.
- Biology and Potential of Pentatomid Predator, Eocanthecona furcellata (Wolff) (hemiptera: Pentatomidae) on Fall Armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (Smith)
Authors
1 Department of Entomology, UAS, Bengaluru – 560065, Karnataka, IN
2 Division of Germplasm Conservation and Utilization, ICAR-NBAIR, Hebbal, Bengaluru – 560024, Karnataka, IN
3 Resource Management in Plant Protection, ICAR-NBAIR, Hebbal, Bengaluru – 560024, Karnataka, IN
4 Department of Plant Pathology, UAS, Bengaluru – 560065, Karnataka, IN
5 Department of Crop Physiology, UAS, Bengaluru – 560065, Karnataka, IN
Source
Journal of Biological Control, Vol 34, No 1 (2020), Pagination: 26-29Abstract
Studies on the biology and feeding potential of Eocanthecona furcellata (Wolff) on Spodoptera frugiperda (Smith) were carried out at NBAIR, Bengaluru. Experimental results revealed that the total developmental period from egg to adult for male and female were 27.92±2.87 and 39.62±3.28 d, respectively. The life cycle of male and female passed through first, second, third, fourth and fifth nymphal instars (male: 2.42±0.51 d, 3.25±0.45 d, 3.25±0.45 d, 4.00±0.60 d, 4.42±0.51 d) and (female: 2.54±0.52 d, 3.46±0.52 d, 4.00±0.71 d, 4.38±0.65 d, 5.08±0.49 d), respectively. Total nymphal period is about 17.83±1.34 d for male and 19.46±1.20 days for female, respectively. Adult longevity of male is lower (10.25±2.96 d) compared to that of female (20.15±3.39 d). The premating period and mating period of adult E. furcellata was 2.33±0.50 days and 6.44±2.24 hrs, respectively. The pre-oviposition period, oviposition period of adult female was 2.89±0.60 and 11.22±1.72 days, respectively. The average number of eggs laid by the female was 209.29±28.11 in a single mated system. Egg incubation period was about 5.42±0.51 days. The predation rates of second, third, fourth, fifth instar nymphs, adult female and male on 2nd, 4th, 6th instar prey of E. furcellata were (16 ±0.95, 27 ±4.06, 55±4.67, 68 ±5.41, 126 ± 4.76, 97 ± 2.85), (7±1.34, 24±2.77, 40±3.39 45±0.71, 88±1.37, 51±1.60) and (4±0.82, 9±1.64, 21±2.81, 38±1.03, 69±1.32, 36±2.73), respectively.
Keywords
Biology, Developmental Period, Eocanthecona furcellata, Predatory Potential, Spodoptera frugiperda.References
- Ahmad M, Singh AP, Sharma S, Mishra RK and Ahmad MJ.1996. Potential estimation of predatory bug, Canthecona furcellata Wolff. against poplar defoliator, Clostera cupreata. Ann Forestry 4(2): 133–138.
- Basappa H. 2011. Biodiversity of biocontrol agents in sunflower ecosystem. J Biol Control 25(3): 182–187.
- Cherian MC and Brahmachari K. 1941. Notes on the three predatory hemipterans from south India. Indian J Entomol. 3: 115–119.
- Kumar S and Singh SV. 2007, Longevity fecundity and sex ratio of Canthecona furcellata on lepidopterous insect pests. Ann Plant Prot Sci. 15(7): 235–281.
- Lenin SEA and Rajan SJ. 2016. Biology of predatory bug Eocanthecona furcellata Wolff (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) on Corcyra cephalonica. J Entomol Zool Stud. 4(3): 338–34.
- Nebapure SM and Agnihotri M. 2011. Canthecona furcellata: A predator of Maruca vitrata. Anna Plant Prot Sci. 19: 451–508.
- Pant CP. 1960. Some aspects of bionomics of Eariasw spp. at Kanpur. Agra University. J Res Sci. 9: 31–40.
- Pillai AK and Agnihotri M. 2013. Biology and predatory potential of Eocanthecona furcellata (Wolff.) on Maruca vitrata Geyer. Madras J Agric Sci. 100: 193–195.
- Siddaiah AA and Devi AR. 2015. Biology of a predatory bug Eocanthecona furcellata Wolff (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) on Vapourer tussock moth larvae: a major pest of tasar silkworm food plants. Int J Indust Entomol.30(1): 26–30. https://doi.org/10.7852/ijie.2015.30.1.26
- Tuan SJ, Yeh CC, Atlihan R and Chi H. 2016. Linking life table and predation rate for biological control: A comparative study of Eocanthecona furcellata (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) fed on Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). J Econ Entomol. 109(1): 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/tov265
- Vanitha K, Raviprasad TN and Shwetha V. 2018. Life cycle of Eocanthecona furcellata Wolff. (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) a predatory bug in cashew plantations, upon rearing on wax moth larvae. J Entomol Zool Stud.6(2): 3007–3010.
- Yi NN and Kyi W. 2000. Biological Control Research Center, Mandalay Division, Singaing Township, Paleik, Myanmar. Proceedings of the Annual Research Conference (Agricultural Sciences), Yangon, Myanmar, pp.58–73.
- Behavioural Response of Specific Larval Endoparasitoid, Apanteles machaeralis (Wilkinson) to Volatile Cues from its Host Insect, Diaphania indica (Saunders) and the Host Plant (Cucumis sativus L.)
Authors
1 Department of Entomology, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore – 560065, Karnataka, IN
2 Division of Entomology and Nematology, ICAR-Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Hessaraghatta Lake PO, Bangalore – 560089, Karnataka, IN
Source
Journal of Biological Control, Vol 34, No 2 (2020), Pagination: 132-139Abstract
Apanteles machaeralis (Wilkinson), a braconid specialist larval endoparasitoid of Diaphania indica occurs naturally causing significant levels of parasitism. The present study explores the response of the A. machaeralis to odour cues from D. indica damaged cucumber plant as well as host larvae. Different odour treatments namely, D. indica larval body volatiles (T1), volatiles from larval excreta (T2), volatiles from larvae + excreta (T3), volatiles from D. indica body wash (T4), volatiles from the healthy, mechanically damaged and D. indica infested cucumber plants (HIPVs) were collected using headspace analysis and the response of female A. machaeralis was studied using olfactometer assays. Results of the study conclusively indicated that A. machaeralis is highly attracted to host larval body wash as parasitic wasps spent significantly more time made more entries into the treated region in single as well as dual choice assays. The electoantennographic response (EAG) further supported the olfactometer bioassays. The GC-MS analysis revealed significant differences in the volatile emissions of different treatments studied. The utilization of host insect body cues and HIPVs in the host recognition by the specialist endoparasitoid A. machaeralis is discussed in detail.Keywords
Cucumber Moth, HIPVs, Olfactometer Assays, Specialist Parasitoid, Volatiles.References
- Anfora G, Tasin M, Cristofaro AD, Ioriatti C, Lucchi A. 2009. Synthetic grape volatiles attract mated Lobesia botrana females in laboratory and field bioassays. J Chem Ecol. 35: 1054-1062. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-0099686-5. PMid:19779942
- Cork A, Beevor PS, Gough AJE, Hall DR. 1990. Gas chromatography linked to electoantennography: A versatile technique for identifying insect semiochemicals. pp. 271-279. In: McMaffercy AR, Vilson ID (Eds.). Chromatography isolation of insect hormones and pheromones. Plenum Press, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-8062-7_26
- de Moraes CM, Lewis WJ, Pare PW, Alborn HT, Tumlinson JH. 1998. Herbivore-infested plants selectively attract parasitoids. Nature 393: 570–573. https://doi.org/10.1038/31219
- de Rijk M, Krijn M, Jenniskens W, Engel B, Dicke M, Poelman EH. 2016. Flexible parasitoid behaviour comes constraint resulting from position of host and non-host herbivores. Animal Behav. 113: 125–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.01.001
- Dweck HKM, Svensson GP, Akman Gündüz E, Anderbrant O. 2010. Kairomonal response of parasitoid, Bracon hebetor Say, to the male-produced sex pheromone of its host, the greater wax moth, Galleria mellonella (L.). J Chem Ecol. 36: 171–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-010-9746-x. PMid:20155500
- Harris CM, Ruberson JR, Meagher R, Tumlinson J. 2012. Host suitability affect odor association in Cotesia marginiventris: Implications in generalist parasitoid host-finding. J Chem Ecol. 38: 340–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-012-0095-9. PMid:22438015
- Jayanthi PDK, Woodcock CM, Caulfield J, Birkett MA, Toby JA Bruce. 2012. Isolation and identification of host cues from Mango, Mangifera indica, that attract gravid female Oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis. J Chem Ecol. 38: 361–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-0120093-y. PMid:22438014
- Jayanthi PDK, Raghava T, Kempraj V. 2020. Functional diversity of info chemicals in agri-ecological networks. Ipp. 187-192. In: Chakravarthy AK (Ed.). Innovative Pest Management Approaches for the 21st Century. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-98115-0794-6_10
- Kigathi RN, Unsicker SB, Reichel TM, Kesselmeier J, Gershenzon J, Weisser WW. 2009. Emission of volatile organic compounds after herbivory from Trifolium pratense (L.) under laboratory and field conditions. J Chem Ecol. 35: 1335–1348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-009-9716-3. PMid:20013039 PMCid:PMC2797619
- Kovats E .1965. Gas chromatographic characterization of organic substances in the retention index system. Adv Chromatogr. 1: 229–247.
- Meents AK, Chen S, Reichelt M. 2019. Volatile DMNT systemically induces jasmonate- independent direct anti-herbivore defense in leaves of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) plants. Sci Rep. 9: 17431. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-53946-0. PMid:31758060.PMCid:PMC6874613
- Meiners T, Wackers F, Lewis WJ. 2002. The effect of molecular structure on olfactory discrimination by the parasitoid Microplitis croceipes. Chem Senses 27: 811–816. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/27.9.811.PMid:12438206
- Mumm R, Hilker M. 2005. The significance of background odour for an egg parasitoid to detect plants with host eggs. Chem Senses 30: 337–343. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bji028. PMid:15788712
- Nurkomar I, Manuwoto SP, Buchori D, Matsuyama S, Taylor D, Kainoh Y. 2017. (E, E)-α-Farnesene as a hostinduced plant volatile that attracts Apanteles taragamae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) to host-infested cucumber plants. Biocontrol Sci Technol. 28: 34-38. https://doi.org /10.1080/09583157.2017.1413340
- Ngumbi E, Fadamiro H. 2012. Species and sexual differences in behavioral responses of a specialist and generalist parasitoid species to host-related volatiles. Bull Entomol. Res. 102: 710–718. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007485312000326. PMid:22647466
- Pare PW, Tumlinson JH. 1999. Plant volatiles as a defense against insect herbivores. Plant Physiol. 121: 325–331. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.121.2.325
- Rains GC, Tomberlin JKD, Alessandro M, Lewis WJ. 2004. Limits of volatile chemical detection of a parasitoid wasp, Microplitis croceipes, and an electronic nose: A comparative study. Trans ASAE 47: 2145–2152. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.17785
- Rutledge CE.1996. A survey of identified kairomones and synomones used by insect parasitoids to locate and accept their hosts. Chemoecology 7: 121–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01245964
- Schnee C, Kollner TG, Held M, Turlings TCJ, Gershenzon J. 2006. The products of a single maize sesquiterpene synthase form a volatile defense signal that attracts natural enemies of maize herbivores. Proc Natl Acad Sci. USA. 103: 1129–1134. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0508027103. PMid:16418295.PMCid:PMC1347987
- Steidle JLM, SchöllerM.1997. Olfactory host location and learning in the granary weevil parasitoid Lariophagus distinguendus (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae). J Insect Behav. 10: 331–342. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02765601
- Sullivan BT, Berisford CW. 2004. Semiochemicals from fungal associates of bark beetles may mediate host location behavior of parasitoids. J Chem Ecol. 4: 703–717. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOEC.0000028426.37482.17. PMid:15260218
- Turlings TCJ, Tumlinson, JH, Lewis WJ .1990. Exploitation of herbivore-induced plant odors by host-seeking parasitic wasps. Science 250: 1251-1253. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.250.4985.1251. PMid:17829213
- van Dam NM, Qiu B, Hordijk CA, Vetlem, Jansen JJ. 2010.Identification of biologically, Vetlem, JansenIdentification of biologically relevant compounds in above ground and below ground induced volatile blends. J Chem Ecol. 36: 1006-1016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-010-9844-9. PMid:20737198 PMCid:PMC2941087
- Wei J, Kang L. 2006. Electrophysiological and behavioral responses of a parasitic wasp to plant volatiles induced by two leaf miner species. Chem Senses 31: 467-477. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjj051. PMid:16621971
- Wei J, Wang L, Zhu J, ZhangS, N,andi OI, Kang L. 2007. Plants attract parasitic wasps to defend themselves against insect pests by releasing hexenol. PLoS ONE 2: e852. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000852. PMid:17786223. PMCid:PMC1955833